Mc Donalds : is there pork in your fish-fillet bun?

Par Al-Kanz

« Produced in a factory that uses sesame,pork » as you can see it is indicated on the label of some of the buns sold in Mc Donald’s, which are used for the fish-fillet!

In January 2011, our post McDonald’s: bacon in your fish-fillet? attracted a few scathing comments from some of our readers, accusing us of being excessive. We were, at that time, pointing out at not only possible but also real contaminations. Here’s what we wrote:

Choosing a fish menu, or eating only fish products at Mc Donalds or Quick isn’t a solution because of all the handling during the preparation of the fish fillet wich could come in contact with others kinds of products. So even though fish is « halal » the fish fillet would end up being unfit for consumption by muslims.

This was quickly confirmed by former McDonald employees. Nothing suprising since it all makes sense. However, it is going to be far more difficult to refute the following elements that are in this case undeniable: some hamburger buns that are sold in McDonald’s restaurants can contain pork, as you can see it is indicated on the label «produced in a factory that uses sesame, pork». Hence the expression «may contain» wich clarifies the facts rather than reveal an uncertainty: the supplier has a legal obligation of mentioning on the label that pork may enter the composition of some of McDonald’s buns and that nothing in the manufacturing process is done to make sure it doesn’t happen. In other words, when East Balt (the supplier), makes the buns, pork can sometimes break into the production chain. As long as it is mentioned on the package label the manufacturer can’t be blamed.

When mentioned on the label, the probability of finding one of the ingredients is high. Hence the precautions that people who are allergic to gluten, peanuts, aspirin, etc. must take. In the case of an allergy, allergen and any material whose use can have serious and sometimes fatal consequences, no one will deny that these labeling conditions are necessary to stop us from eating a product because we know the hazardous ingredient is present. In the case of pork, there are always objections, excuses, false arguments.

Let’s have a look at the elements we have on the McDonald buns packaging.

McDo : du porc dans les pains du Filet-o-fish

If we zoom in:

McDo : du porc dans les pains du Filet-o-fish

Even better!

McDo : du porc dans les pains du Filet-o-fish

Last October, we tried to learn more about it by calling East Balt in Fleury Mérogis, Essonne (France). We started of by asking for information about the fat acid monoglyceride E472 in that particular bread [ East Balt updated it at 12:45 on the 24th of January: the company said that the E472 in the bread was of plant origin] but we didn’t get any answer to our question about possible pork presence. They promised to call us back, we haven’t heard from them since.

But I only took a breef inspection of the company’s website to confirm the presence of pork on the production lines. In the « products » of, here’s what we found:

McDo : du porc dans les pains du Filet-o-fish
Screenshot of

Zooming in, we can see that pig processed as bacon, is actually part of the ingredients handled in the plant.

McDo : du porc dans les pains du Filet-o-fish

Regarding the previous label,they are for all McDonald’s « king size » breads, the cheese sandwiches, Mc bacon. So far no problem when you do not consume halal meat. What is problematic, however, is that it also afects the Royal-o-fish, the burger fish.

McDo : du porc dans les pains du Filet-o-fish
Royal-o-Fish – Jordan Bracco

But also the « Reg » breads (Regular), and thus the famous Fish-fillet, typicaly consumed by Muslims fond of McDonald’s hamburgers.

McDo : du porc dans les pains du Filet-o-fish
Filet o Fish – Roslyn

The lesson we can draw from this, is that we must always check what’s on our plate before eating. The McDonald case is certainly going to provoque a large reaction, because the brand is iconic and the Fish-fillet widely consumed by Muslims. But it’s all our food and consumption habits that we have to reconsider. It doesn’t mean becoming Sherlock Holmes or falling into psychosis when it comes to swallowing something, still we must keep in mind that not verifing food carries the risk of eating a product that may be present. The most concerned ones should read the book «Toxic Food» by William Reymond. You will never look at mass-produced food like you did before…

Finally, dear readers, please consider that this article is by no means sufficient evidence and go as fast as possible in a McDonald’s restaurant and ask to see the packaging of the bread we talked about. Do not trust Al-Kanz, check for yourself.

(Thanks to Claire Short for the translation)

Soutenez Al-Kanz, téléchargez l'application sur votre smartphone.

Téléchargez l'application Al-Kanz dans l'Apple store Téléchargez l'application Al-Kanz pour Android

Vos réactions (3 commentaires)

  1. Melati Fadla    

    Thank you for this awesome information :)
    i’ll check it later and come to McD restaurant


Écrivez votre commentaire

Indiquez une adresse de messagerie existante. Elle ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

 caractères sur les 1 000 autorisés

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.